Let's do an experiment. How would you answer these questions:
- Donate some money to save the environment. The amount needs to be bigger than $1,000 and may be less than $5,000. But it has to be in that range. Would you ?
- Would you be willing to give that donation to an industrial corporation instead of an environmental or nature organization, so they give you tools to be less harmful ?
- What if you could have less negative impact on the environment without giving this amount to a corporation, through change of your behavior over time. And perhaps you could donate the money to a real cause ?
I started to ask these questions and more, when I discovered the differences in prices of hybrid vehicles.
At first, I was asking the simple question of how much would I "save" if I
purchased a hybrid vehicle. Then, after seeing price differences I started to
ask people I know who purchased hybrid vehicles, about what made them buy one.
Around that time I listened to a podcast about
signalling in
economics and its effects on purchase behavior, specifically relating to
Toyota Prius owners, which put the "vanity" angle on hybrid vehicle ownership.
So I wanted to do some more research.
Here I am sharing the process and
results of what I have done while evaluating the topic. As a disclaimer, I am
not suggesting that you should or should not buy a hybrid vehicle. I am not
suggesting a brand is better or worse than others. Finally, I am not suggesting
that you should or should not care about environment and/or spend money to
protect it. Hope the content below helps you make decisions that work better for
you.
I took Toyota's Prius and Corolla, and Honda's Civic and Civic Hybrid. The prices are from internet from the same site (
CarPoint.com) so they are consistent among themselves. I also noted the MPG values from the same site, for each model.
Average price and average MPG values assume that the same individual would make
similar feature choices when buying a car and would drive in a similar way
independent of the type of the car.
Toyota-Prius |
$24,000 - $39,525 |
$
31,762.50 |
51/48 |
49.5 |
Toyota-Corolla |
$16,130 - $18,820 |
$
17,475.00 |
27/34 |
30.5 |
Honda Civic
Hybrid |
$24,200 - $26,900 |
$
25,550.00 |
44/44 |
44.0 |
Honda Civic |
$15,755 - $27,805 |
$
21,780.00 |
28/36 |
32.0 |
At first glance, we can see that buying a Prius would make you pay 55% more, and
would save you 61.5% on gas. That sounds like good savings right ? The only
caveat is that you pay for the car upfront, in cash, while you pay for gas over
time. It does not matter that you get a loan for your car payment for this
topic, since you are taking a loan with today's value and paying it over time.
What this means is that %61.5 savings in the overall gas consumption may or may
not make up for the premium you are having to pay for the car itself. Welcome to
the magic of present value and compound interest.
The concept of
present
value comes into play here. In the simplest of terms, the gas you buy over
time, although you pay the same amount of money every time, has less of a value
today in monetary terms. So if you pay $100 every month for gas, the value of
your yearly gas expenditure is not $1200 but less. (specifically, PV of $100
monthly payments with 3% market interest rate for a year is $1,180.73)
-
One way to think about it is this: if you gave some amountyour money
to invest in a CD, with no risk, you would get that money and some more
at the end of the month. For any interest amount greater than zero, you
would have to give less than $100 today to receive $100 at the end of
the month.
If the monthly interest rate is 1% for instance, and if
you had $99.00 today, it would be able to buy you $99.99 worth of gas
for you at the end of the month. So in a way, $99 today is equal to
$99.99 at the end of the month. From that, you can reach the conclusion
that if you spend $100 a month, you could be given less than $1200 today
and you would be able to cover your yearly gas expenditure. Present
value calculates what that amount is.
-
What amount of money should you be given today, at present time, to
be able to cover your monthly gas bill for a year ? That is the question
present value answers.
The picture is more complex though, since how much you spend on gas depends on
the gas price and the mileage you are putting on the vehicle. For the same
driver, we can assume the same mileage and we can pick a reasonable gas price
for this simulation, since it is the same gas price whether you are using a
hybrid or conventional engine car. Let's assume that a driver drives an average
of 1,000 miles a month and gas prices average about $3.80 a gallon. The monthly
gas pricing for each vehicle is shown below.
Toyota-Prius |
$ 76.77 |
Toyota-Corolla |
$ 124.59 |
Honda Civic Hybrid |
$ 86.36 |
Honda Civic |
$ 118.75 |
With the assumptions we are talking about (1000 miles per month and $3.80
per gallon of gas) we can now calculate what the savings are for 3, 5 and 7 year
periods for a hybrid car owner. The comparison here takes Corolla and Prius, and
Honda Civic and Honda Civic Hybrid.
These are great savings figures. In three years, with today's value, you
would be saving quite a bit of money by driving a hybrid vehicle. But wait a
minute, this does not take into account the money you would have paid upfront
for the hybrid. If you bought a Toyota Prius vs. a Toyota Corolla, you would
have paid about $14,287.50 more upfront. If you bought the Honda Civic Hybrid
vs. the conventional engine Civic, you would pay $3,770 more. Let's put these
values into the calculation and take a look at things once more.
Total Savings |
3 years |
5 years |
7 years |
Toyota |
$
(12,643.05) |
$
(11,626.07) |
$
(11,139.97) |
Honda |
$
(2,656.35) |
$
(1,967.62) |
$
(1,638.43) |
Wow !!! Look at these numbers. With the driving habits and prices we have
outlined so far, if you owned a Toyota Prius for 3 years vs. owning a Toyota
Corolla, you would have paid $12,643.05 more. The picture gets better with Honda
Civic vs. Civic Hybrid, but you still pay about $2,656.35 more in three years.
What does this mean ?
It means that buying a hybrid does not save you money. It is that simple. The
whole sales pitch about people who are saving money so if you care about your
wallet you should consider a hybrid is... misleading. The situation becomes more palatable if you pay less for the hybrid, but if you can negotiate that way for the
hybrid, why could you not negotiate for a conventional car. There is the
government tax credit $3500 to $4,000, which would certainly help. That credit
is no longer available however, so if you are buying one today, a hybrid car is
costly to own. The big issue here is that you are paying this difference
upfront. This is money leaving your pocket as soon as you take the keys. If you
are taking a loan to pay for the car, you are probably paying for this
difference with a loan that is more expensive than 3% a year, which makes things
even worse.

You could drive less, but interestingly driving less does not help. Driving
more does. The hybrid cost advantage is unlocked as you use the car more. The
more you drive, the more of the upfront payment you get back in payments, and by
polluting more you save more. It is like the old TV commercials that talk about
sales of things that you would never buy anyway and say that you are saving
money. Not really. I am simply trying get my original investment back.
So I am convinced that there is absolutely no financial benefit to buying a
hybrid. Well, at least to me there isn't. As of April 2012, Toyota has sold 2.87
million Prius units. At an average of $10,000 a piece price difference, Toyota
has made about $28.7 Billion from Prius, vs. selling the same amount of cars in
other comparable models (in this case, for simplicity we are taking Corolla).
That is a large chunk of money. To give you an idea, Bill and Melinda Gates
foundation has investments around $26 Billion. So Toyota has made more money
that it can invest on the environment with Prius. And it did
donate $1
Million in 2005. I am sure Toyota and other companies who build hybrids are
donating in large amounts, but is it comparable to $28.7 billion extra that
consumers are paying ? This number is a subset of the overall hybrid sales by
Toyota, which is 4 million units.
We could argue that the investment is being made so that the hybrid
manufacturers can improve their production. Well, that is called a stock market.
You can buy a share of the company, the company then invests in things, and pays
in dividends or stock value, or both. But in this case, none of that exists.
Company makes money, you get the same thing that you would have gotten, more
expensive, and feel good that you are good to the environment. Are you though ?
Production of a
hybrid is more expensive and hybrid cars don't live as long as conventional
ones. The price difference is an indication of the additional cost of
production, and that translates into environmental cost as well, since labor,
energy and
rare materials are spent during production. So it is not super clear how
one helps the environment by buying a hybrid either. Not in a measurable way at
least.
Here is my personal take on all of this data. In the end, hybrid ownership is
like a donation check made out to cash. The money goes to car manufacturers,
government (in form of sales tax on the car), and the car dealers as commission
of the overall price. How much of it does the environment gets is not very
clear. One thing is for sure, only rich people would be buying the hybrids right
? They are so expensive, there is clearly no financial return, you would have to
care about the environment very much to donate over $10,000 in one sitting. I
say that a hybrid owner must be really well off. It is better than driving a
luxury car, since not only you are spending cash to feel good, but also you are
doing it under the umbrella of giving to the greater good. Well, it turns out
that people do buy hybrids and specifically Prius for status. That takes us to
the podcast comment I made,
Freakanomics covered this.
I wish you environmentally and economically savvy days ... May your decisions
be easier than mine.